<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Altgate - Latest Comments in Strategies for Two-Sided Markets</title><link>http://altgate.disqus.com/</link><description>A blog on startups, venture capital and everything in between</description><atom:link href="https://altgate.disqus.com/strategies_for_two_sided_markets/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:26:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Strategies for Two-Sided Markets</title><link>http://altgate.com/blog/2008/03/strategies-for-two-sided-markets.html#comment-7340265</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, can you talk a bit more about two-sided markets?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Harsha</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:26:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategies for Two-Sided Markets</title><link>http://altgate.com/blog/2008/03/strategies-for-two-sided-markets.html#comment-1926688</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two-sided markets are definitely prevalent in the Web 2.0 world and your article describes the situation very well.  I work for a site, &lt;a href="http://www.catalystcode.com," rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.catalystcode.com,"&gt;http://www.catalystcode.com,&lt;/a&gt; that looks at current business news from the perspective of two-sided markets.  Please take a look, your feedback is welcome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For a more academic treatment of the subject, there are some great resources at &lt;a href="http://www.26econ.com/resources/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.26econ.com/resources/"&gt;http://www.26econ.com/resources/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deborah Block-Schwenk</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:12:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategies for Two-Sided Markets</title><link>http://altgate.com/blog/2008/03/strategies-for-two-sided-markets.html#comment-1926687</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The two-sided networks or as you have mentioned the two sided markets have become very popular. Credit cards, end-users and developers system are perfect examples. Internet is one of the most popular two sided markets of the 21st century. If I am not mistaken together with price adjustment one should take into consideration networks effects as well, otherwise it would be hardly possible to avoid mistakes. What about multi-sided markets? I just begun to wonder if you have money and you want to start a business is it better to develop two-sided or multi-sided market.It depends, I know…&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:24:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategies for Two-Sided Markets</title><link>http://altgate.com/blog/2008/03/strategies-for-two-sided-markets.html#comment-1926686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great pointer to the Harvard article and great topic for discussion. One note: the link to the Harvard paper shows up for me with two http:// references. Remove one and the link will work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Sherrett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:21:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategies for Two-Sided Markets</title><link>http://altgate.com/blog/2008/03/strategies-for-two-sided-markets.html#comment-1926685</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thx for the comment Jim!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From what I hear, TheLadders has been very successful.  I recently read an article talking about a $7BB valuation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And yes, Monster definitely views "resumes" as most valuable.  They have very detailed metrics on acquisition cost and, hey, their Superbowl ads target employees not companies!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regarding TheLadders, you raise a good point.  Using the logic of the paper, the company is more valuable.  Hmmph.  Need to think about that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fnazeeri</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:41:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Strategies for Two-Sided Markets</title><link>http://altgate.com/blog/2008/03/strategies-for-two-sided-markets.html#comment-1926684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for calling attention to Eisenmann's paper on this still timely topic.  I get your point at the end about the "one side subsidizing the other" and the reversal of value-prop that TheLadders recognized.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Curious:  Has TheLadders been successful with their "entrance fee" for the mall?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Semantics:  Using the "valuable" term as you did, aren't you saying that Monster views the "employee as more valuable" and in the 100K+ job market, TheLadders views the job-opp as more valuable?  Hence defining the cash direction?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jim&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>